civil society

Author: 
Kara Hadge
Abstract: 
This paper analyzes models of participation for global Internet governance, using the World Summit for the Information Society (WSIS) as a case study. Given the bottom-up genesis of the Internet and the collaboration it encourages, it is ironic that Internet governance thus far has been implemented in a top-down manner, primarily by state and business actors. Drawing upon liberal and constructivist perspectives in global governance, this paper argues that WSIS failed to achieve legitimacy and allow for accountability in its attempt at multilateral deliberative processes, and future mechanisms for Internet governance should more fully include civil society.

The suggestion that the Internet may be the last great frontier is widely accepted as cliché: by nature, it is without physical boundaries, and by practice, it is subject to relatively little regulation. It unites people across continents and has expanded the worldwide capacity for communication, while fostering a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship. It is the province of all—individuals from every culture and walk of life, industries across the spectrum of the business world, government actors, and the activists who challenge them.  Read More »

“We are witnessing a fundamental change in how individuals can interact with their democracy and experience their role as citizens.  Ideal citizens need not be seen purely as trying to inform themselves about what others have found, so that they can vote intelligently.  They need not be limited to reading the opinions of opinion makers and judging them in private conversations.  They are no longer constrained to occupy the role of mere readers, viewers, and listeners.  They can be, instead, participants in a conversation.” – Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks  Read More »

Author: 
Tatyana Varshavsky
Abstract: 
Cultural participation is seen, and has been shown to be, something of a proxy measurement for civic engagement.  Participation in the arts reinforces aspects of social cohesion and the building of community and cooperation.  In an ideal world, intercultural understanding and diversity are not far behind.  Due to the interdisciplinary focus of both terms, defining cultural participation and civil society is no easy matter. Cultural participation is key to the “good life” that civil society strives to achieve, while the twin freedoms of speech and expression are intimately tied to the foundations of a participatory democracy.  The author of this paper specifically engages with the following questions: (1) What implications does cultural participation – in terms of citizens’ active engagement in the arts in their communities – have for democracy?, and (2) How do recent and current national multimedia projects engage cultural participation, and what can we learn from them?
Syndicate content Subscribe